National Race Masters Blog

Back to Blog Home…

Submitted by Noel Michaels on Wednesday, March 30, 2016 at 3:35 PM


The Aqueduct main track spring meet - which opens on Thursday, March 31 for nineteen racing days leading up to the opening of Belmont at the end of April - is always one of the most overlooked and underrated race meets of the year.  Aqueduct's spring meet is always highly anticipated following the long cold winter in New York on the inner dirt track, and with only 19 days on the main track in the spring, if you blink, you'll miss a short but sweet month that features the return of turf races, and many big-name jockeys, trainers, and horses to New York racing.

On the racetrack, the Big A main track meet brings instant relief for the winter racing blues with a meet that includes sprints at distances other than 6 furlongs, and eventually even the much-anticipated return of turf racing in New York, which is perhaps delayed a week or so this year due to an unseasonably cold spring in New York.

However, if the temperatures aren't a sure enough sign of spring, then perhaps the upcoming runnings of the year's first Grade 1 races in New York - the Wood Memorial and the Carter Handicap - along with the return of baseball season, will finally be able to break-up the spring malaise for sports and horseracing fans.

The 2016 Wood Memorial is Saturday, April 9, and it will headline a race card of five graded stakes races along with the G1-Carter Handicap, the G2-Gazelle, the G3 Excelsior, and the G3-Bay Shore.  The Wood Memorial, New York's premier Kentucky Derby prep race, is expected to attract a great field of Derby hopefuls led by the top finishers from the Gotham.



Whereas the Aqueduct main track's Fall Meet is in many ways essentially just an extension of the Belmont Fall Meet, the Aqueduct Spring Meet represents the start of a major changeover for New York racing in many ways at this time of year.

First off, higher-profile horses and barns begin to return to New York from Florida, either directly, or in some cases with a stopover in-between in Kentucky.

Second, as mentioned above, turf racing returns to the New York condition book along with the warmer spring weather. This should help fill more races and provide relief from the steady diet of five-, six-, and seven-horse fields that Aqueduct was plagued with on the inner track this winter, especially since the re-opening of Parx.

And third, a wider array of races are available on the main track, namely 6 ½-furlong and 7-furlong races which cannot be run on the inner track.  Perhaps this is the biggest change with the move to the main track at Aqueduct - the different track configuration that hastens the return from 6 ½ furlong and 7 furlong sprints, as well as one-turn miles, to the New York racing scene that cannot have one-turn races longer than 6F on the inner track. This change cannot be underestimated, especially for the longer sprint-specializing horses that have been shoehorned into 6F sprints all winter long, by necessity. These 6 ½ furlong and 7 furlong specialists who have been losing all winter long on the inner track can now stretch back out to their preferred distances, and thereby often show dramatic and immediate turnarounds in their form.

The same is true for one-turn mile lovers who were forced to go two turns all winter long in mile races and longer. Different horses generally excel in one-turn miles than in two-turn miles, and one-turn miles also give a better chance for stretchout sprinters to be able to handle the added distance.

Beyond just the track layout, also be on the lookout in a horse's career record box in the past performances for Aqueduct main track and turf course horses-for-the-course. These horses are usually different than the inner track horses for the course, and often can improve their fortunes immediately with the switch away from the inner track. They can improve and turn the tables on the same horses who'd beaten them all winter, and usually do so at a price.  Conversely, stay on the lookout for inner track horses for the course. Those winter track-lovers will likely take a downturn in form as soon as they step foot on the Big A main track's very different footing.



In terms of running style and post position favoritism, keep in mind that Aqueduct's main track is among the fairest there is. Very little advantage can be gleaned by any one post position or running style versus any other. Interestingly, despite the rail post having a bad reputation in the main track's one-turn miles, the statistics fail to back that up.

All posts, including the rail, appear to be fair in one-turn miles, and if anything, based strictly on the numbers from recent main track meets under the current track superintendent, the rail seems to be better in mile races (one turn) than it is in two-turn routes. This is exactly the opposite from what one might expect. At other distances, post positions and running style preferences also are virtual non factors here. If anything, perhaps sprints can occasionally favor inside posts, but this is not a big enough bias to base your bets on.

Keep a close eye on how the track plays during the opening week of the Aqueduct main track spring meet, and be flexible enough to "go with the flow" with your wagering when it comes to track bias.  An opening week bias might be just a short-term trend, but on the other hand, even a short-term trend may turn into a meet-long bias at a meet like this which lasts only about three weeks.



Aside from the return of high-caliber stakes racing in the spring on Aqueduct's main track, the other big occurrence this time of year is the return of turf racing.

Many of the best bets on turf during the Spring Meet are horses that are coming in from out of town with some current form, or at least recent turf form, to show for themselves over the winter. These horses seem to have an edge over the turf horses who've wintered in New York. The exception to look for in this regard, however, are layoff turf horses who have purposefully been given a prep or two on the dirt in anticipation of the spring opening of Aqueduct's turf course. These horses are interesting because they almost always will have returned from a layoff with a very poor-looking dirt race(s) meant as preps, and therefore they can be live overlays that shouldn't be overlooked at big prices.

Nevertheless, these returning turf horses are often strictly being prepped and "given a race" on the dirt by their trainers, who sneakily are looking ahead with their eyes on a return to the grass at this short spring meet at Aqueduct. The best advice for these horses is to toss out their dirt preps and consider them "prepped and ready" for much better efforts when switched to the lawn at Aqueduct.

As far as running styles are concerned on the Aqueduct grass course, many handicappers assume speed carries well on the Aqueduct turf because of its tight turns. Take note, however, that that only about 15% of all turf winners at Aqueduct go wire-to-wire. In fact, not only aren't front runners good bets on the Aqueduct grass - but even the pace pressers sometimes don't fare too well, either.  In total, about two-thirds of all grass winners should come from the second flight, or further back, during the early stages of the running of the race. Therefore, bet strong finishers on the Aqueduct lawn until you see proof that this trend is reversing.

Not surprisingly, the far outside posts generally do not do well on the Aqueduct lawn, as you would expect. Even when the closers tend to win more than their share, posts 8 and outward struggle on the Aqueduct turf.  This seems to suggest the importance of saving ground early in Aqueduct turf races, especially around the first turn.

Finally, beware the far inside rail Post #1 on the Aqueduct grass, which has been dead on-and-off for parts of the past few years. Horses from other inside posts generally do well, but the rail post itself is hit-or-miss.  Perhaps it is something that has to do with wet or dry weather.  In wet weather, the turf rail might be the last place to fully dry out, making it a disadvantage when the track is being upgraded from something other than "firm" condition.



When it comes to the top trainers at Aqueduct, the story usually is all about leading trainer David Jacobson over the winter, but this season was completely different with Jacobson splitting his stable between New York and SoCal, and being a virtual non-factor at Aqueduct.

Maybe it's a good idea to keep betting against Jacobson when he's overbet, expect for the times when he pulls his patented claim-and-drop maneuver - which would be a red flag for many other barns, but not his. He racks up the wins with class drops all year long.  Aside from that, however, you've really gotta look beyond betting David Jacobson horses in order to make any money this spring.

With the cat away, the mice will play. With the top slot in the Aqueduct trainer standings wide open this winter, the guy who stepped-in as the dominant force on the circuit was Rudy Rodriguez, who has run away with the training title on the inner track with ? victories through ?.  He has led all trainers all winter long, and should continue to roll this spring all through the Aqueduct main track Spring Meet.

Beyond Rodriguez, you have to respect a couple of other trainers have also had highly exceptional winters this season on the Aqueduct inner track, led by Linda Rice, who was a clear second to Rudy all winter while racking-up ? wins with good performances in just about all categories.  One lower-profile trainer who also should be mentioned amongst the inner track meet standouts is Danny Gargan, who has rarely been better than he was this winter when he won roughly 23% of his races and was in-the-exacta nearly half of the time with a record of ???.  Horses sent out from both of these trainers must be bet right now, because their ROIs are so much greater than the Rodriguez horses that are usually favorites and always low-priced.

Plenty of Todd Pletcher horses and Kiaran McLaughin horses also won at the inner track meet, which should come as no surprise to anybody.  These trainers, in particular, should continue to do great throughout April and beyond in New York, as their first-string better horses return from out-of-town.

Finally, it should be noted that many of the big-name barns that go down to Florida for the winter were pretty quiet this year during the inner track meet. However, this group of top trainers will wake-up in a hurry, including big-names like Chad Brown, James Jerkens, Shug McGaughey, Christophe Clement, and many others. Just like clockwork as the temperatures start to rise, you know these guys will return from Florida, especially after Keeneland, and begin lighting it up in New York again this spring.

When you are handicapping the Aqueduct main track, you inevitably are going to run into a whole lot of Aqueduct inner track past performances. The Aqueduct inner track is often known for its track biases, and this past season was no exception with some cancelled days and a lot of outside biases in-between. February, in particular, was almost entirely affected by an outside bias on the inner track to various degrees, when the rail path was almost always slow and the outside almost always better. Here is my list of Aqueduct inner track biases for the 2015-2016 inner track season:

Aqueduct Track Biases
(Through March 20)
Mar. 19 - Speed bias, inside preferred
Mar. 18 - Speed bias, inside preferred
Mar. 10 - Speed dominated in sprints
Feb. 28 - Inside two posts well-beaten in every race
Feb. 27 - Speed good, outside good
Feb. 26 - Outside preferred
Feb. 25 - Outside preferred
Feb. 20 - Speed good
Feb. 18 - Slow rail and outside preferred
Feb. 6 - Drying track favored outside posts races 6-10
Jan. 15 - Outside preferred, slow rail
Jan. 2 - Speed advantage
Dec. 26 - Slow rail, outside rally wide bias
Dec. 20 - Speed good
Dec. 19 - Speed good, had to be on or close
Dec. 10 - Speed bias

Dec. 2 - Speed good in slop
Nov. 26 - Speed good, had to be on or close
Nov. 21 - Speed good later in card on drying track
Nov. 13 - Drying-out, unsealed track
Nov. 12 - Outside good, difficult to close from far back on wet track
Nov. 11 - Speed bias on sloppy track
Nov. 8 - Speed good
Nov. 7 - Speed good
Nov. 5 - Outside preferred

When it comes to post positions, the 2015-2016 winter inner track meet was up to its old tricks this past season, favoring horses breaking from the inside four post positions in routes, and making life difficult for horses breaking from posts 10 and outward in routes, and from posts 11-12 in sprints.

The fact that far outside posts didn't do even better at this past season's Aqueduct inner track meet is strange, because outside trips did so well for much of the meet, particularly throughout February when the track was often biases against inside posts/trips. The track was favoring outside trips, but the outside posts still couldn't show good win percentages.

In route races on the inner track, the inside posts (1-4) were the preferred place to be, with a slight advantage over horses drawing the middle part of the gate (posts 5-6), and a stronger advantage over horses drawing any post 7 and outward.  In total, horses breaking from inside posts 1-4 won about 60% of the routes run on the inner track throughout season.  Horses drawn far outside in posts 10-12, on the other hand, rarely won with a combined record of 2-for-34.

In sprints, it really didn't matter what post a horse started from, as long as it was no wider than 10.  The far outside posts 11-12 were only a combined 2-for-32.


If you blink, you'll miss one of the great and underrated race meets of the year in Thoroughbred racing - the Big A main track Spring Meet.  Enjoy the season, and don't miss it!  Good luck and good racing at Aqueduct!

By Noel Michaels

Join the discussion


Forgot password

Keep me logged in